Archive for the ‘Education’ Category

Hey Buddy, got $9 trillion to spare?

Tuesday, November 27th, 2007

A trillion is a number that nobody understands. Its just too big. A billion is too big as well. A billion is one thousand million. When you have a million, you must collect one thousand of those millions before you have a billion. Well… a trillion is when you collect one thousand of those billions. Nine trillion is when the universe explodes.

Here is what we know. Since Bush took office, he has raised the debt limit five times, and it now currently stands at $9.815 trillion. This is a lot of money. You know who the government borrows from? Your pension and social security. Isn’t that nice? We also owe Japan, China, the U.K., and many oil exporting countries.

But that doesn’t matter, does it? The president is responsible for paying off that debt. He has made it clear that his priorities lie in killing people in the middle east, and lining his pockets, so we are going to have to look somewhere else.

The first thing we need to do is severely curtail military spending. We don’t need more nukes than Jesus. The Pentagon gives itself some 400 billion every year so that it can continue to line the pockets of presidents and politicians who are invested in oil companies. But it also seems like a military build up of mass proportions. Unless we plan on invading planet Earth, I don’t think we need more nukes than Russia, China and everyone else combined times 3.

So, annually we spend $38 billion on education, $50 billion on children’s’ health insurance, $13 billion on humanitarian aid, and $2 billion on non-oil dependency. But then, we spend $463 billion on the Pentagon.

Our prestigious panel of high-ranking retired military and Dept. of Defense officials says $60 billion can be trimmed from the Pentagon budget without putting our troops at risk, weakening our national defense, or hurting our ability to fight terrorists. According to Dr. Lawrence Korb, who served as President Ronald Reagan’s assistant secretary of defense, the savings would come primarily from cutting obsolete Cold War weapons and excessive nuclear weapons from the defense budget. See Korb Report for more information.

-Truemajority.org

If we invested in education and healthcare what we did in the pentagon, we might have a new generation of better educated children (ones who don’t think God created humans with magical clay) with better jobs and more income, which in turn is better for the economy, which in turn is better for the national debt. Countries invest in us because of our strong economy, but we know that in order to avoid losing that interest, we need to keep it strong. So how can we get our economy on the treadmill and lifting glorious weights everyday? Invest in life, not death.

Death is stupid. Life is smart. Two heads are better than one, blowing up someone’s head with an M16 reduces two heads to one head.

It would seem that we are more interested in raising our children to be soldiers who sacrifice themselves so that corrupt presidents can get richer than raising our children to be successful scholars, artists, musicians and businessmen and women.

Obviously, none of us are smart enough to figure out how to reduce the national debt, thats why we need to throw some money at school and hope they produce smarter people.

Enjoy.

“This post is being submitted to the Facing Up Blog Carnival on the $9
Trillion Debt”

whereIstand Tags

My Old Physics Teacher Fires a Gun in Class

Thursday, May 25th, 2006

This is a story from my old high school about my  old high school teacher. He was an incredible teacher, I mean just phenomenal. He really made physics great, and enjoyable, and it almost felt like an honor to know him.

He was strict about attendance and punctuality, and I think he was a republican, but he still was a great teacher, and was very good at involving California public high school (the lowest in the country) in Physics.

So I was totally annoyed when I saw this article:

Every year, physics teacher David Lapp brings his Korean War era M-1 carbine to school, fires a shot into a block of wood and instructs his students to calculate the velocity of the bullet.

It is a popular experiment at Mill Valley’s Tamalpais High School, where students are exposed to several unique stunts that Lapp performs in his five classes every year to illustrate inertia, velocity and other complex formulae.

Turns out, it also may be illegal.

It is a felony to bring any rifle, loaded or unloaded, onto a school campus without the written permission of the school district superintendent or his designee, according to Marin County District Attorney Ed Berberian.

Lapp, a former military police officer who has been teaching for 20 years, said it is the first complaint ever lodged against the so-called "ballistic pendulum" experiment, which he contends is completely safe.

The .30-caliber bullet, he said, is fired into a foot-long, 8-pound block of wood hanging by cords from a ceiling mount. The students take measurements of the block’s movement and mass and use that information to calculate bullet speed.

He said he fires the shot from point-blank range with all the students standing behind him, so there is no danger of an accident or ricochet. There has never been an injury or close call, he added.

"I’ve been doing this for years," said Lapp, who skipped two or three years after Columbine. "The students love it. They ask about it very early on in the year. It’s one of the more exciting demonstrations."

Honestly, in a school where fights broke out all the time, kids brought hand guns to school, and one student died every year on average (all while I was there), a teacher using a historic military rifle firing a bullet to teach physics is probably the only way to teach. I remember one TV once watching a teacher teach a gang member about basic atomic theory, and started off by having the student imagine the "East" gang circling the neighborhood, where the "Positive" gang and the "Neutral" gang lived…

Lapp also had us build rockets which we fired, which I recall got me more into Physics than anything I can think of. I remember the occasional explosion coming from his classroom exciting the whole building, everyone wanted to learn Physics. For god’s sake, what is wrong with that?

We were seniors in high school, if he hadn’t gotten shot at school or beat up by gang members, then the chances of us getting hurt in this demonstration was pretty low.

"It’s just absolute madness, from my point of view," said Feinberg, one of the founding members of the National Emergency Assistance Team, which has responded to most of the school shootings in the country. "It is not only crazy in concept, in light of the world we live in it is absolutely irresponsible."

Feinberg said he is shocked that a teacher would bring a gun to school in the wake of tragedies like Columbine, regardless of the educational purpose.

"Were there not other ways of illustrating whatever physical principles he was trying to demonstrate?" Feinberg asked. "What’s the message we are giving bringing a loaded gun into a public setting and firing it off. It’s a terrible model to project on students."


My favorite line is "whatever physical principles he was…". This stunt that Lapp pulled is what engaged us kids, and in the long run, probably saved a lot of us from getting hurt in the future. There were so many more serious problems at that school, I can’t believe the media or the law focused on this one. Absolute madness.

I know I don’t advocate hand guns, and I know I am completely anti-violence, but this doesn’t really fall into that category. This is a physics demonstration, pure science, if the device had not been called a gun, but used a similar projectile and similar fuel to project the projectile, it wouldn’t have been such a problem. In a world where guns already exist, and if everyone insists on using them anyway, why not use them to teach something interesting like physics.

whereIstand Tags

Weighing in on teaching

Wednesday, April 19th, 2006

First of all, teachers suck. We don’t need teachers, they are a waste of time. Who needs education anyway? The lord imbues us with knowledge, and Jesus gives us homework to do.

Whoa sorry, I think I was channeling Bush.

I don’t think there has been any disagreement yet about teachers getting paid more. I suppose the question is, whether or not that would solve our problems? I am willing to be convinced that it will.

The babysitter thing is true. I remember my math teacher yelling at us in high school that she doesn’t want to ‘babysit’ us , and that a babysitter (in Marin county) gets 20 dollars an hour, significantly more than she makes. I felt bad for her, she was a crazy lady, but she was right. I wish I could have told her that someday, she’ll make 200k a year.

I also support higher standards for teachers, but then again, I had an excellent history teacher who received emergency credentials. He was hilarious, often making us laugh until we cried, while teaching us good!

Grade school teachers and high school teachers have a huge hand in our development. I was very close with my teachers because of small class size and first name basis, and I remember all of them very well. Some were good, others were bad, but I do feel like my education could have been better had the teachers been paid more, and met all those standards listed earlier.

Clark makes a good point, how realistic is this? Currently, the government spends 40 billion dollars a year maintaining nuclear missiles from the cold war. I think there is some money in that budget to improve education in this country.

However, I have trouble condoning any action that involves "throwing money at a problem". I don’t think thats a good way to solve problems. And I do think its dangerous, some teachers or would be teachers might be put off by the idea of advanced degrees, it also might be well above their budget for education.

It is admirable that teachers are willing to do what they do for such little pay. Does it mean that they generally have an interest? Or that they don’t know what else to do with their lives. I think latter is less likely.

whereIstand Tags