The cease-fire that wasn’t. Updated
Sunday, July 30th, 2006The press reports that Israel has agreed to a 48 hour "cease-fire" in response to the bombing in Qana where reports coming out of Lebanon indicate over 30 children were killed. Israeli spokesperson Adam Ereli agreed to suspend aerial activity, but made clear that Israel maintained the right to "take action against targets preparing attacks against it."
In my mind, a cease-fire requires a cessation of military force - in its entirety. It does not mean, ‘we will stop dropping bombs from the sky for 48 hours so that we can try to improve our public image because we have just slaughtered innocent people and by the way, we reserve the right to resume bombing when we feel like it."
How will Israel know whether "targets [are] preparing attacks"? Are there Israeli intelligence gathering forces in southern Lebanon? Can Israel see Hezbollah prepare rocket launches? More likely, Israel will resume attacks once the public outcry against the Qana bombing subsides. Maybe they will wait 48 hours or maybe they will continue military action earlier and justify it with a claim of suspected aggression by Hezbollah - a claim impossible to verify. Then again, who’s checking? No one.
July 31, 2006 -
Israel apologizes for airstrikes near the Lebanese village of Tayba. While the airstrikes were not directed at specific targets, they were intended to protect ground forces. A Lebanese military vehicle is reported to have been hit by the airstrikes.
whereIstand Tags