Defending Truth, Not a Political Party

It certainly is easier to “throw stones” at President Bush than to find reasons to praise him, especially since his positives are extremely difficult to find. However, for me it is not about Democrat versus Republican. To make such accusations shows a lack of ability to reason. Bush’s proponents like to blame Democrats for being judgmental instead of responding to the charges. I suppose it is easier doing that than attempting to justify the president and his failed policies. Meanwhile, did I see hope in Senator Barack Obama? Absolutely. Do I still? Maybe.  Can I look at the situation critically without feeling a need to defend one particular party? Without a doubt.

 

Yes, this Reverend Jeremiah Wright ordeal has hurt the candidate in a number of ways. Two nights ago, Jon Stewart hosted Newt Gingrich on The Daily Show. In the past, one particular blogger dismissed Jon Stewart, calling him liberal, and refused to watch the program because of the preconceived notion. However, after I encouraged this blogger to watch a couple of shows he admitted that Stewart did take a position that was opened to dialogue. That said, Gingrich, someone whom I detest on a number of levels, did make one point that was something to consider regarding Obama and Wright after Stewart pointed out the inequitable aspect of other politicians who are associated with ministers who also make outrageous comments. Gingrich noted that Obama had been a member of Wright’s church for twenty years. That certainly is something to consider. Wright was offensive and divisive in his recent displays. I am encouraged that Obama denounced Wright’s actions, but I do wonder if Obama sang the preacher’s praises over the last two decades while witnessing the same grandstanding. Naturally, Senator Clinton must feel as though Wright’s blustering blew some air into her campaign. However, all of this media/political frenzy is just so disastrous.

 

Last night, I caught the last bit of the movie Primary Colors and welled up during the scene when Libby, the Kathy Bates’ character, had managed to dig up dirt on the opponent running for presidency and brought it to Stanton, the John Travolta character. She was heartbroken that Stanton was willing to use the dirt for his gain, having hoped he was above such smut. (Especially since he had his own lies to cover.) Well, politics is dirty and oftentimes tragic. The thing is it appears that it is rarely about average people in this country trying to get ahead, but about a select group hungry for power and prestige. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if all our politicians cared less about him or herself and put the voters first? I do believe that Obama came into the campaign somewhat unjaded, but I wonder if that hope is beginning to tarnish, thanks to the media having a field day with Wright.

 

Meanwhile, it is five years ago today when that banner on the USS Abraham Lincoln hanging behind the president announced “Mission Accomplished” and five years later lives are still being sacrificed for a cause with little merit. The office of the presidency has much power and yes, whether a Democrat or Republican, I will point out the political failings, even if it appears I’m throwing stones.

whereIstand Tags

Tags:

2 Responses to “Defending Truth, Not a Political Party”

  1. Paul Says:

    You might throw stones as both Democrats and Republicans, but you will throw more at the latter rather than the former. Everyone is bias (that’s just the way it is) and I believe your loyalties are on the Democrat side.

  2. CarolHoenig Says:

    I stand by my point: “Bush’s proponents like to blame Democrats for being judgmental instead of responding to the charges. I suppose it is easier doing that than attempting to justify the president and his failed policies.”

Leave a Reply