School’s Out Forever!
Sunday, April 9th, 2006I’m no on this issue with this caveat: the public school system would NOT be improved under THIS federal government. The No Child Left Behind Act is a ridiculous farce and any federal fix for the state-run education system is currently not working:
Of the 315 Shelbyville students who showed up for the first day of high school four years ago, only 215 are expected to graduate.
In today’s data-happy era of accountability, testing and No Child Left Behind, here is the most astonishing statistic in the whole field of education: an increasing number of researchers are saying that nearly one out of three public high school students won’t graduate, not just in Shelbyville but around the nation.
For Latinos and African-Americans, the rate approaches an alarming 50 percent. Virtually no community, small or large, rural or urban, has escaped the problem.
There is a small but hardy band of researchers who insist the dropout rates don’t quite approach those levels. They point to their pet surveys that suggest a rate of only 15 percent to 20 percent.
The dispute is difficult to referee, particularly in the wake of decades of lax accounting by states and schools. But the majority of analysts and lawmakers have come to this consensus: the numbers have remained unchecked at approximately 30 percent through two decades of intense educational reform, and the magnitude of the problem has been consistently, and often willfully, ignored.
That’s starting to change.
During his most recent State of the Union address, President Bush promised more resources to help children stay in school, and Democrats promptly attacked him for lacking a specific plan.
I went to school two towns away from Shelbyville, and even when I graduated six years ago I realized that something was wrong with the Indiana school system - every year in elementary school we took a standardized test called I-Step to monitor progress, then in high school, I-Step passing became mandatory to graduate high school. The problem is that with any comprehensive test, students feel pressure to learn the test rather than the things the test is supposedly designed to gauge. Also there’s this: the I-Step was on a curve so something like 30% of students who took the test were failed sophomore year and had to retake it junior year, and senior year was the last chance. So regardless of credits, students could potentially not graduate high school, and when they retake the test they are competing with the class below them for that 70% of passing slots.
This seems like a defeatist system, but I don’t think this federal government could do better - in fact No Child Left Behind seems to have upped the ante on I-Step.
This has been Andy D.
whereIstand Tags