Archive for December, 2006

The Church of Hugo

Sunday, December 31st, 2006

Hugo Chavez, revolutionary marxist may want to become High Priest of his own church according to Father Jonathan Morris:

According to media reports coming out of Latin America, President Chavez is considering a proposal that would establish him as the high priest of his own form of evangelical Christianity, convert his cabinet members into bishops of a lower rank, and submit church activities to the civil and military power of his government.

It is still unclear who is behind the proposal. Publicly, it has taken the form of a petition by leaders of “Centro Cristiano de Salvación” (Christian Center of Salvation). The association claims to represent 17,000 evangelical churches and 5,000,000 Venezuelans. Their request is simple: make their denomination the country’s official religion, teach it in all public schools and pay the pastors from government coffers. In turn, they will make Chavez their head bishop and promise to submit absolutely to his authority. 

Chavez’ political critics say the petition is anything but spontaneous and independent. Edgar Zambrano, a deputy of the Venezuelan National Assembly, told the Spanish newspaper “El Mundo” that he has no doubt that “President Chavez is the one behind the proposed law.” Human rights groups are crying unfair play, warning this may be a government-orchestrated ploy to wrest away power from yet another sector of Venezuelan society, while allowing Chavez to appear to be merely acquiescing to popular acclaim.

This, of course is the type of thing America’s founders were thinking of when they wrote the first Amendment. Of course, few people know much about this group making the proposal, but Morris views it as entirely up Chavez’s alley based on his experiences in Venezuela last February:

I also saw the shrewd attempts of President Chavez to link himself to the success of the procession and manipulate the religious message into a purely nationalistic one of which he was the lone star. Hours before the procession, he interrupted all television and radio programming so he could deliver without competition his media message. He sent military jets to fly over the crowds with an impressive air-show of military might. He paid thousands of “volunteers” to wear government shirts and pass out free water bottles and pro-Chavez literature.

I could seriously see Chavez doing this. The Catholic Church has been an opponent of his and by meeting this request, he could shut them up, along with doing the same to Independent Protestant  Churches. 

I would further predict that the thugh Chavez would continue to have fans in the United States. Mind you these people would be the same ones who act as if those who favor putting a creche in a city park are the the American version of the Taliban. But, I doubt they’ll have much problem with a state sponsored religion just as long as Bush is named as the devil.

whereIstand Tags

Paying People to have Babies: The Results of Population Hysteria

Sunday, December 31st, 2006

There are a lot of uncomfortable expectant mothers in Germany today. Why? Reuters is reporting that a large number of pregnant are trying to delay delivery until after the 1st of the Year. What’s interesting here is why they’re putting this off:

Expectant mothers in Germany are doing what they can to put off giving birth until January 1 when a generous government aid program takes effect.

The media has been filled with tips and warnings from doctors and midwives about holding off birth until January 1.

While experts have warned women to refrain from medical intervention to delay births, they acknowledge the allure of a financial incentive worth up to 25,200 euros ($33,300).

Worried about a shrinking population and a birth rate at a post-war low in 2005, the government in September introduced the law to encourage working couples to have children. Babies born on or after January 1 qualify for the new benefits.

Parents who take time off from work to care for newborns can receive two-thirds of their net monthly salary, up to a maximum of 1,800 euros, for 12 months. If the other parent takes a further two months off, the benefit is extended to 14 months.

"It should send a clear signal that our society wants to try to compensate for some of the financial loss young parents face," Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen was quoted saying in the online edition of Der Tagesspiegel on Tuesday.

In what is an extraordinary story in light of environmental concerns about a "population Bomb" Germany is terrified about a Population decline so much that they are handing out a huge benefit and I can understand why a woman would put up with a couple more days of pregnancy in order to obtain them.

Consider the amazing turn of events. 120 years ago it was an expected part of life (a given, in fact) that people would have children, but now society has so radically transformed that the German state has reached the conclusion that it must offer a generous package to have children.

Declining population growth and a large Welfare State like Germany’s is a deadly mix. With older workers leaving the workforce and those on the doll living longer, you have an ever-lessening pool of workers to support an ever-increasing class of pensioners and those dependent on the state. 

In the United States, we’re still listening to hysteria about population growth while our society’s value and opinion of children continues to drop like a rock. Our birthrate is just near replacement level for population but if trends continue, we may soon be handing out such benefits to those who have children. 

The experience of the World points out the harsh reality. Russia, Japan, Australia, and other nations have been paying incentives for some time. Singapore has a particularly ironic case. In the 1960s and 70s it ran ads discouraging large families, than faced with the reality of population decline in the early 90s, they began to run ads encouraging more children. 

From past experience, changing our society’s perspective on children will be far less expensive than giving couples huge financial incentives to do what comes naturally to our species.

whereIstand Tags

Writers Give Themselves No Respect

Sunday, December 31st, 2006

There was an interesting article in this week’s Writer’s Weekly regarding writer pay. Katherine Swan was insulted by a website offering her $5 an article (she should see the ones that offer $2 or $3) and the publisher responded by defending as part-time work for those who wanted to write, not make a ton of money. Swan sees a vicious cycle of self-fulfilling prophecy in the oft-heard warnings that you can’t make a living writing:

Many adults who are writers today & and even some of those who aren’t, yet wanted to be at one time & have similar stories. Some, like me, eventually decided to become writers anyway, while others relegated their passion to a hobby. But I believe there is another casualty here & as if the loss of every budding writer’s dreams isn’t enough. I believe that this oft-repeated truth is in part responsible for the reality that well-paid writing jobs are becoming harder and harder to find.

The message that you can’t earn a living by writing is not just heard by young hopefuls, after all. It is like chain mail, repeated to twenty other people for each time it is heard. So while some of us are protesting, pointing out that we have and do make our living by writing, editors, publishers, and get-rich-quick schemers are taking it to heart that they don’t really have to pay their writers very much. After all, no one expects them to.

And they are right. Expectations of a writer’s pay are going down all the time. As society continues to repeat its mantra, new writers enter the field with ever-lower expectations of pay. Worse yet, employers have catered to the constantly diminishing expectations, until they have come to see anyone who wants to be well-paid as being traitorous to the starving artist ideal. Ultimately, by warning young people that they can’t make their living as a writer, these well-intentioned adults have set us up for being underpaid in our profession.

I think there’s some truth in this. Certainly, the reason you’ll have websites offering $1 or $2 or $5 an article is that they know there are some people who will take the offer for the oppopportunity to write. 

It’s a challenging situation, because being paid little to write certainly beats being paid nothing to do so. Certainly some of these companies posting low paying jobs are dishonest or cheap, but many others have no wiggle room in the budget and they’re paying what they can. On the other hand, there’s a real danger of seling yourself and your writing too short. I tend to take the philosophy that taking a low paying job can allow you to get credits and encourage you in your writing and build up a portfolio of clips. 

Businesses should be aware of what they’re getting. The less you’re willing to pay the more challenging you’re going to find getting a truly good experienced author. 

The author needs to have some plan to get paid. Starving Author is not acceptable when you can work your way up to satisfied and well-paid with a little more effort. Clearly writers need to have a business mindset. My suggestion would be:

1) Have minimum standards (no $1 or $2 an article gigs to be sure.)

2) Be willing to start at the bottom and work your way up the writing food chain.

3) Have a plan to make your writing grow and increase revenue.

Until writers understand the business side of this as a process (not thinking low pay is acceptable forever but also not turning their nose up at jobs that are fitting given their level of experience and skill.) you’re going to have discontented writers and a continuing drop in pay.

whereIstand Tags

Christianity v. Global Sex Trafficking

Sunday, December 31st, 2006

Christiantiy Today has a fascinating article on Christians going overseas to help women caught in the sex trafficking trade:

When Moon was 12 weeks old, her birth mother sold her to a local Burmese woman, who raised her like a slave. When Moon (not her real name) was 3 years old, this second "mother" forced her to wash dishes in a restaurant eight hours a day. When Moon turned 13, the woman sold Moon’s virginity to a Western businessman in Thailand. But she fought her way free.

A few months later, she wasn’t so lucky. Her second mother blocked the hotel room door after an Indian man paid 30,000 baht ($800) and then beat Moon with a belt until she submitted to sex. She had to be carried home. For 10 days, Moon couldn’t walk.

"I felt like throwing up," she says. "I was repulsed by my ‘mother’ and afraid of men. I was sad and ashamed, because I wasn’t clean."

A year later, across the border in northern Thailand, the same woman tricked Moon into working at a noodle stand that was in reality a brothel. When Moon refused to comply with her first customer, the brothel owner slapped her and taped her hands to the bed. She shouted, so they forced a ping-pong ball in her mouth and taped it shut. The second night, 15 men used her; the next night, 9; the next, 11. The johns included men from Thailand, Myanmar, Japan, Korea, India, and the West. The owner’s brother, a policeman, drugged Moon and 10 other captive girls to keep them awake at night. They were threatened with cigarette burns.

Moon tried to escape, but the woman owner and her brothers locked her in her room and kept an armed vigil at the brothel. Several times, policemen visited in street clothes and used Moon for free, compliments of the owner. She begged them for help. But they told the owner, who beat Moon and threatened to throw acid on her face.

During her time in the brothel, Moon was raped about 100 times.

"I cursed every god. But in my heart, I believed someone would come and help me," Moon says. She was right. After nearly a month in the brothel, the police and International Justice Mission, an evangelical ministry, rescued her.

Each year, hundreds of thousands of women and children are prostituted around the globe. Moon was one of an estimated 1 million children who annually enter the multibillion-dollar industry of commercial sexual exploitation, according to UNICEF. In Thailand alone, where prostitution is technically illegal, some 200,000 girls and women are exploited.

Four years ago, missionaries Mark and Christa Crawford in Thailand learned of Moon’s plight. Since then, they’ve introduced Moon to Jesus and tried to help her earn a decent living—a challenge for someone without marketable skills. Moon says that since the Crawfords entered her life, "I have realized that I have value and worth. And now that I know God, I can always pray for his help whenever I have a problem."

The Crawfords are among a growing number of Christians worldwide working to live out the love of Jesus by reaching out to sexually exploited people.

They offer counseling, discipleship, and prayer for the wounds of sexual trauma and lead many women to Christ. But after deserting the sex industry, these women also need help supporting themselves and often their families.

"The story’s not over because someone is rescued from a brothel or decides to leave a ‘bar,’" says Christa. "It’s only beginning." Christianity Today found a few cutting-edge organizations around the world that include work opportunities in their model for personal and spiritual restoration. Whether it’s through manufacturing handbags in India or producing soymilk in Cambodia, these organizations help once-broken women discover their full worth in the eyes of Jesus.

The Crawfords weren’t the type of people you would expect to be missionaries. Christa was a graduate of Harvard Law. Mark, a pastor of a growing church. They left it all behind for a greater purpose.

They ran into a huge concern with adult women who were trapped in prostitution because they saw no other options. Their knowledge from the Corporate sector came in quite handy:

Few Christian organizations were reaching these women in Chiang Mai. So in 2003, the Crawfords decided to pioneer their own outreach, Just Food, Inc., representing "Justice and Food."

Western-style cafes are popular among locals, the large expatriate and missionary community, and the city’s 3 million-plus tourists each year. Christa designed a menu full of the California cuisine she craved, and they opened a modest café housed in a bookstore, featuring items like Southwest chicken wraps and tandoori chicken pizza. They trained women—former prostitutes and those at-risk of entering the trade—to make tortillas and gourmet coffee drinks, to serve customers, and to run a kitchen.

Despite the café’s enticing menu and décor, some Thai Christians refused to patronize a business tainted by the stigma of prostitution, and many churches have been hesitant to get involved in any way. "By associating with prostitutes, you’re lowering your status," Mark says. "It’s like working with lepers. Are you going to infect yourself if you’re associating with these people?"

The Crawfords did help one Thai church to open a daycare facility for children of prostituted women.

In 2004, the Crawfords launched a new venture, a combined counseling and vocational training program called Garden of Hope. With Western food still in high demand, Mark and Christa are now raising capital to start a culinary arts academy at their rehabilitation center. The new ministry will reach out to at-risk women, children, and men. In addition to baking and cooking classes, the ministry will offer computer training.

The Crawfords anticipate that training for legitimate jobs in restaurants and hotels will fit with the women’s gifts. "These women are [already] in the service industry," says Christa. "We need to redeem their skills."

The Crawfords’ views on vocational training were shaped by Mark’s years as a training manager for Ritz-Carlton Hotels. "The emphasis was not correcting people’s weaknesses, but playing to their strengths," he says.

With prostitution, "you’re pretending you want to be with someone you don’t want to be with. You have to present a false image of yourself," Mark says. The couple believe offering multiple training options will help the women and girls discover how God has gifted them and regain a sense of self.

In addition, the women employed at the ministry’s garden café will gain customer service and basic marketing skills. The Crawfords aim to link graduates with jobs and apprenticeships at restaurants and four- or five-star hotels, such as the Four Seasons. Christa hopes to someday supply the four local Starbucks with cinnamon rolls, brownies, and muffins.

The Crawfords also want to turn Just Food, Inc., into a franchise, operating restaurants, bed and breakfasts, and spas where recovering women can gain work skills in supportive environments.

This year, they plan to offer loans to 30 women to start microenterprise businesses. They’re seeking an experienced businessperson to oversee such business development. "We need most the people who think they are least qualified to be a missionary," Christa says, "because often missionaries are the least qualified to start and run successful businesses." While their hopes are high, Christa and Mark are not naïve to the challenges of their ministry, especially working with women who often lack formal education and are recovering from sexual exploitation.

It can be quite easy for some "ultra-righteous" folks to denigrate private sector careers, but the experience in the private sector teaches much. It shows what to do and what not to do. 

It’s reminiscent of a scirpture in the book of Exodus that a friend cites in explaining her ministry:

And Moses answered and said, "But, behold, they will not believe me, nor hearken unto my voice; for they will say, `The LORD hath not appeared unto thee.’"  And the LORD said unto him, "What is that in thine hand?" And he said, "A rod." -Ex. 4:1, 2

She takes the principal that whatever you have in your hand (money, talents, gifts) can be used to fulfill God’s purposes. Clearly, few saw God’s had preparing the Crawfords in training at Ritz-Cartlon and training in Corporate Law, but women escaping sex trafficking every year are seeing the results of it.

whereIstand Tags

Tell Me What to Watch

Thursday, December 28th, 2006
    My wife and I are on the cusp of a small dilemna, that you can help decide. I’m not a huge fan of movies in general. However, for Christmas, my boss gave me 1 movie ticket. Now, that means to go see a movie, I still need to buy a ticket for my wife. But that still cuts the cost in half. 

    At this time of the year, I find not one, but two different movies that I’d like to see and I’m certainly not going to spend the money to see both (one at full price,) so the question is which do I see. 

    In this corner, we have Rocky Balboa. Everyone, including yours truly thought the idea of a 6th Rocky was going to be another embarassment to Sly Stallone. Instead, from all reports, we have a movie that’s probably as good as any Rocky film since the original and a fitting end to the series that appeared ruined by Rocky V.

    On the other hand, we have The Pursuit of Happyness a moving drama that celebrates the value of fatherhood and may be Will Smith’s most serious role yet, as it tells a great tale of Father and Son.

    So which to see. That’s your choice. Whichever, you my readers say I should go to, I’ll go to. Here are some reasons to base a vote on:

     

    • You saw one movie and liked it.
    • You saw one of the movies and hated it.
    • You’d like to see one movie more than the other.
    • You think I’d like one movie more than the other.

    Both have positive reviews from Focus on the Family’s Plugged In.  Both look very interesting me and I’d be happy with either, but I’m giving readers a chance to choose what I say and in turn what movie I review:

    Click here to vote.

whereIstand Tags

What Does a Failed Math Test Tell Us?

Thursday, December 28th, 2006

The President of a Public School Teacher’s Union was the victim of an on-air ambush: 

The radio audience was live and the question for teachers union president Randi Weingarten involved sixth-grade math: "What’s 1/3rd plus 1/4th?"

Weingarten, however, is a not a sixth-grader or a math teacher. She’s a lawyer and a union boss who once taught high school social studies - and no one told her there was going to be a quiz.

"I would actually have to do it on paper," she said when asked yesterday to complete the math problem on WNYC’s "Brian Lehrer Show" where she was a guest.

Mike Pesca, who was filling in for Lehrer, introduced the show’s education topic by saying American college grads can’t do basic math while high school grads in Canada and middle-schoolers in India have no trouble.

After Weingarten stumbled, another guest quickly produced the correct answer: 7/12ths, leaving Weingarten to explain herself.

"I do it the old-fashioned way," she said. "You take your paper, your pen, you add it up and get the fractional whatever."

Now, when you talk about the "fractional whatever" I have serious doubts that you could actually solve the problem on paper, but let’s leave that aside. 

I could solve the problem, but don’t think this actually tells us a whole lot about the general shape of public schools or of Teachers. It suggests sadly that much of our time in schools is wasted by the very nature of the system. 

We learn facts that we’ll never need, never use, and never really wanted to know in the first place. There;s a certain argument (popular among students in particular) that we get more math, history than we really need. In my position with a major financial institution, I never use anything more complex than the four basic functions. 

In much of the liberal arts world, you never need to make complex calculations involoving Algebra, Geometry, or Trig. In fact, having finished school, many people never do anything more complex than figuring out their taxes. 

Why do we have to learn all that math? Because we may end up choosing to go into a field later in life that requires it. Example: Computer programming. Of course, at that point remedial teaching may be needed, but the remedial will be easier than going through the whole course without firsthand knowledge to begin with (at least in theory.) Still, if you plan on going into Education, you better memorize those fraction multiplication and division steps. You’ll need them. 

Hat Tip: Club for Growth

whereIstand Tags

On Useless Facts

Thursday, December 28th, 2006

The BBC has a list of "100 useless facts" that we didn’t know last year. Of course, many these facts are far from useless. Many are downright fascinating and some are vitally important:

2. There are 200 million blogs which are no longer being updated, say technology analysts.

I know, it. I own three of them and Oatney and I have another together over at Blogspot.com. I also have a Xanga account I set up but never set up the Xanga, as well as a Diaryland Diary, I set up back in 2001. If I think a little harder, I’ll figure out how I abandonned the other 199,999,993. 

14. Online shoppers will only wait an average of four seconds for an internet page to load before giving up.

We’re an impatient lot. I’m stubborn and will hang around for 30 seconds to a minute. Now, I feel great about being so virtuous. :)

23. More than one in eight people in the United States show signs of addiction to the internet, says a study.

Me? Addicted? I can quit anytime I want. Looking at my life, I reflect that I found my wife online, my current offline job, WhereIStand, blogging. At my regular job, my regular job requires the use of Internet explorer for Intranet applications and the whole position requires the use of a nationwide network. I hate to say it, but I’m probably online in one form of another more times than not unless you count sleeping.

26. Each person sends an average of 55 greetings cards per year.

Was a little below average on that. Maybe 20 or 30.

27. Just one cow gives off enough harmful methane gas in a single day to fill around 400 litre bottles.

Does kinda create a dilemna for Global warming theorists.

30. The brain is soft and gelatinous - its consistency is something between jelly and cooked pasta.

Am I the only one disturbed when scientists describe the brain using food metaphors? Ewwwww. 

40. The medical name for the part of the brain associated with teenage sulking is "superior temporal sulcus".

Thanks, but we’ll just call it "teenage sulking" until someone comes out with an inhibitor.

45. Cows can have regional accents, says a professor of phonetics, after studying cattle in Somerset

The good news is that British, not US Taxpayers footed the bill for this one.

47. Watching television can act as a natural painkiller for children, say researchers from the University of Siena.

Brain killer, too.

55. While 53% of households have access to a garage, only 24% use them for parking cars.

The great mystery of people keeping $500 worth of stuff in their garages while parking their $20,000 cars in the driveway continues.

58. Forty-one percent of English women have punched or kicked their partners, according to a study.

It looks like a Men’s rights movement is needed in Britain. as men are paradoxically getting beaten and half of the population and approves of husband beating. 

67. Music can help reduce chronic pain by more than 20% and can alleviate depression by up to 25%.

Not valid with Leonard Cohen songs.

84. Thinking about your muscles can make you stronger.

Depending on how much fat you have, it may be easier to actually excercise than think you rway to a better you. 

86. Six million people use TV subtitles, despite having no hearing impairment.

Sometimes, it’s too hard to turn them off. 

87. Goths, those pasty-faced teenagers who revel in black clothing, are likely to become doctors, lawyers and architects.

If they grow out of it. Quite frankly, there are a few (far too many) that get absorbed by the darkness in suicide and the like. (I cover this in my novel, "Two Sides of the Hill.") I’m skeptical of the "study" at seems more based on opinion than observable fact.

94. There are two million cars and trucks in Brazil which run on alcohol.

Evidence of why we need alternative fuel here.

95. US Secret Service sniffer dogs are put up in five-star hotels during overseas presidential visits.

Not sure this is much of a surprise. If the President’s staying in an official residence or a 5-star hotel, where are the dogs who sniff out bombs supposed to stay? If you answer the local pound, you’re wrong. 

There are many more facts (and some are more specious than others.) Hat Tip: Club for Growth

whereIstand Tags

History Already Made

Thursday, December 28th, 2006

Carol takes issue with media coverage of the death of President Ford:

It’s not quite the hoopla when Reagan died, but it’s still going to be even more difficult to find out what is actually happening across the globe while a throng of cameras are trained on one coffin as if waiting for the dead to rise.

Sorry, but a deceased former president is not history in the making.

I’m certainly not a defender of the media and definitely not a defender of media overkill. My observation is that media doesn’t usually go too far in covering deaths, but rather in covering actual events. Be it the Oklahoma City Bombing, 9/11, or the OJ Trial, the media searches for new angles on long running stories. 

As for finding out what is actually going on in the world. I’d suggest that with UPI, Reuters, and AP wires available, any citizen has the same ability to read the news as any reporter.

A Presidential death is a rare event. Since 1973, there have only been 3 of them (Nixon in 1994, Reagan in 2004, and Ford in 2006.) So, a Presidential funeral and its preparations are a rarity. 

There’s a certain pagentry if you will to the funeral for a President. It will not end until President Ford is laid to rest. There’s good reason for this. 

The media during this time does extensive coverage of the President’s life and death. Usually, all we learn from the news is "What happened today?" (or  "What do the media intelligencia want you to think about what happened today?") Instead, we’re being reminded of our past. Each time, there’s a Presidential death, we learn more someone we really thought we knew. By the time, we reach the end of it, we’re ready for it to be over, but I think what we learn while we watch is well worth the sacrifice in knowing every detail of what happened in Washington. 

The long-term lift to our culture’s health far outweigh the benefit of not instant coverage of the politicians’ latest ramblings.

whereIstand Tags

Those Political Churches

Wednesday, December 27th, 2006

Based on media coverage you’d think churches were politically hyperactive. Not so, says two recent studies

Two studies were conducted by Ellison Research (Phoenix, Arizona) for Facts & Trends magazine. One surveyed a representative sample of 797 Protestant church ministers nationwide, while the other companion survey questioned 1,184 adults who attend Protestant churches at least once a month.

The studies asked each group about their personal political views, as well as how appropriate it is for churches to be politically involved in a number of ways. Of those surveyed, only 6 percent of clergy and only 11 percent of lay church members said they feel their own church is "very involved in local politics or political issues."

And among the clergy and laity polled in the two surveys, in terms of national politics or political issues, the numbers were nearly identical. In fact, Ellison Research’s president, Ron Sellers, says politics is "one area where the laity and the ministers basically were of one mind on how involved their church is."

For example, Sellers notes, "we have 76 percent of pastors who say their church is very involved in study of the Bible, 41 percent, very involved in overseas in overseas evangelism or missions; but only seven percent say their church is ‘very involved’ in national politics or political issues."

Meanwhile, the research company official points out, "You’ve got a majority of all churches saying that they’re either not very involved or they actually avoid political issues." So in reality, he says, "even though the whole church-state separation and involvement of a few churches and things like that are in the news all the time, relatively few churches are really very actively involved in politics."

The studies revealed that the churches most likely to be involved politically are Pentecostal and Southern Baptist congregations. However, Ellison Research reports, even in those denominational groups, few churches go beyond being "somewhat involved" in national or local political issues.

Also, while pastors who are evangelical and/or politically conservative were found to be slightly more likely than others to report some political involvement, the difference turned out to be small. And overall, the researchers report, "there are no major differences in involvement in local politics according to the pastor’s theology (mainline or evangelical) or the pastor’s personal political views (conservative, moderate, or liberal)."

 The problem for the left then would be any pastors, any ministers, or any churches being involved in politcal issues (not endorsing candidates mind you, just issues.) Most pastors who are focused on Evangelism don’t want to risk losing potential converts by being all hot and bothered about social and moral issues, so those get left outside the church.

Hate to break it to you but you’re average American pastor has little more to do with American politics than your average American. But even that’s too much for many of our average liberals.

whereIstand Tags

Kerry Gets Dissed

Wednesday, December 27th, 2006

Whenever, a member of Congress goes over to Iraq, they generally have a whole crowd of people around them, particularly from their home state. Well, when John Kerry went to Iraq, there were people from Massachusetts there, but no one was there for John Kerry.

Yes, after John Kerry has made a career of bashing US soldiers as murderers and baby killers, the Troops stopped playing nice. They didn’t get in his face and yell. (No reason to debase their honor for Kerry.) But in a silent protest they send a message loud and clear. 

(Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin)

whereIstand Tags